Budget killer bad hires:

How companies can easily improve their hiring process
Budget killer bad hires: How companies can easily improve their hiring process

Around 14% of all new hires fail. With 50 hires per year, this can quickly add up to over $300,000 in direct costs. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The real damage become apparent later: declining team performance, lost innovation, and a domino effect that drives top performers to competition. Bad hires are like a slow leak in the system. That’s exactly why they often go unaddressed for a long time. It’s time to change that.

The domino effect: from the wrong hire to crisis 

The obvious costs are clear: recruiting expenses, onboarding, months of salary, and a new hiring process. Studies estimate the replacement costs – depending on the role and seniority – at 50% to four times the annual salary.

But even these figures fall short. By the time a bad hire becomes apparent, six to twelve months have often already passed. During this time, the team has to compensate, for example by working longer hours and putting in more effort to coordinate. stress level rise, quality declines, and the risk of exhaustion and burnout increase structurally. The important thing to note is that the damage rarely affects just one person. Bad hires can trigger chain reactions that destabilize entire departments. At this point, at the latest, it becomes clear that is not a “soft” cultural issue, but rather the measurable business of hiring decisions.

Skills-first meets personality-first 

Many organizations still focus too much on applicants’ professional qualifications and too little on what really make people successful in everyday life: ownership, integrity, resilience, learning ability, and collaboration. Oxford Economics sums it up succinctly: Managers are hired for their professional qualifications – and fired for their personality.
The solution is not either/or, but a smart combination:

  • Skills-based to ensure the professional foundation,
  • Personality-based to increase the likelihood of sustainable performance.

Important: It’s not about testing more, but about making better decisions. The key lies in the predictability of performance.

From gut feeling to measurable results 

This is where this AI-supported diagnostics come in: they can significantly increase the quality of professional performance forecasts.  Companies report 31% faster hiring times with AI tools, 50% better quality of hire, and with proper implementation – 50-61% less unconscious bias.

How personality-based recruiting works: 

  • NLP instead of multiple choice: AI analyzes open-ended text responses. The results are less socially desirable and closer to actual thinking and communication logic.
  • Big 5 Model: Measures scientifically validated dimensions such as openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
  • Entrepreneurial Capital: Includes characteristics that count in dynamic environments – such as risk-taking, innovative strength, and problem-solving skills.
  • Cultural fit: Comparison of personality with values, working methods, and team dynamics.

Instead of “it’ll do,” organizations receive data-based probabilities of success, enabling them to plan to plan team capacities and implement projects more reliably. The KPIs are clear: shorter time-to-fill, higher offer acceptance rate, better quality of hire, higher retention rate, and shorter time-to-productivity. The latter in particular is often underestimated: suitable employees become productive more quickly. 

HR: From process owner to decision-making authority 

When recruiting is understood as strategic value creation, the role of HR automatically changes. HR is then no longer the authority that coordinates appointements and guides process steps, but rather the function that sets the decision-making standard. This means that HR is not only responsible for ensuring that hiring takes place, but also that it is of high quality, i.e., transparent and business-relevant. HR ensures governance, fairness, and compliance without losing speed.

More stability, less rework, more leadership capacity 

In the long term, this creates a system that not only fills positions faster, but also better. Fewer miscasts mean less friction, more stable teams, and more leadership capacity for value creation instead of damage control. 

Companies that modernize their decision-making standards in 2026 will gain an advantage in a working world where adaptability, responsibility, and cultural fit determine competitiveness.

Download the whitepaper “The business impact of fast and precise recruiting decisions”


Prof. Dr. Florian Feltes

Prof. Dr. Florian Feltes is co-founder and co-CEO of zortify and a forerunner in AI-supported HR innovation. Together with his team, he develops intelligent personality diagnostics and helps companies identify the perfect candidates—without expensive assessments and without bias. His vision: a world in which every company can effortlessly form high-performance teams and create work environments that allow human potential to flourish.

Prof Dr. Florian Feltes - Round
You may also like
1 in 700 is not enough! – How companies really hire based on skills   Image

1 in 700 is not enough! – How companies really hire based on skills  

Three-quarters of companies have announced in recent years that they will evaluate candidates more on the basis of their actual skills and competencies rather than formal qualifications. However, a Harvard study shows a clear discrepancy between promises and reality.

2025 Check-Out with Marcus & Florian, CEOs of Zortify Image

2025 Check-Out with Marcus & Florian, CEOs of Zortify

What do you think: Beyond the hype – where does the HR industry really stand today when it comes to AI? Marcus: Looking at the big picture, I believe the fundamental question “Do we use AI in recruiting?” has been answered clearly. The focus is now shifting to the question: “How good are the AI systems we use?”

Bias out. ROI in: The unexpected win of AI regulation Image

Bias out. ROI in: The unexpected win of AI regulation

How AI in recruiting went from being a mere tool to a driver of the future. February 2025. While some companies are frantically reviewing their AI-supported recruiting processes to meet the EU AI Act requirements at the last minute, others are remaining calm. They have used the previous months not only to ….